Namibia Crypto Licensing Status Checker
About This Tool
This tool displays the current provisional licensing status of key virtual asset service providers (VASPs) in Namibia as of October 2025. It shows which companies have received provisional licenses and their current status.
Company | Original End Date | Extension Requested | Current Status |
---|---|---|---|
Landifa Bitcoin Trade CC | 31 Jan 2025 | 31 Jul 2025 | Awaiting final audit |
United PayPoint (Pty) Ltd | 31 Jan 2025 | 13 May 2025 | Under review, compliance gaps noted |
Mindex Virtual Asset Exchange | 31 Jan 2025 | 21 Nov 2025 | Operating sandbox, monitoring tools installed |
Key Insights
- Three companies received provisional licenses in early 2025.
- None can currently serve Namibian customers until full approval.
- Extensions show regulatory scrutiny and compliance challenges.
- Companies must meet strict AML/CTF standards before full licensing.
Key Takeaways
- The Bank of Namibia (BON) still says crypto isn’t legal tender, but the Virtual Assets Act of 2023 forces crypto firms to register.
- Three companies received six‑month provisional licences in 2025; they cannot serve Namibian customers until full approval.
- All Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) must follow the Travel Rule for transfers above NAD20,000 and meet strict AML/CTF standards.
- Individuals using crypto can face account restrictions at major banks, despite the regulatory sandbox for firms.
- The sector sits in a paradox: licences exist, yet public crypto trading remains technically illegal.
When it comes to Namibia banking restrictions on cryptocurrency transactions are a set of rules that aim to control digital‑asset activity while the country still treats crypto as non‑legal tender. The landscape has swung from a hard‑line ban in 2018 to a tightly‑controlled licensing regime in 2023‑2025. Below is a step‑by‑step walk‑through of how the policy evolved, what it means for businesses, and how everyday users are affected.
Early Opposition (2018‑2021)
In May2018 the Bank of Namibia (BON) issued a stark warning: crypto assets are not recognised as legal tender, and anyone trading them has "no recourse to the Bank in the event of financial loss." The statement also said BON opposed using crypto for payments and would not support any domestic or international crypto exchanges. This stance effectively shut down any formal banking relationship with crypto traders.
First Softening (2022)
Two years later BON announced that merchants could accept Bitcoin at their discretion. The change did not alter the legal‑tender status, but it opened a gray area where crypto payments were tolerated if a shop chose to accept them. The move hinted at a willingness to experiment without committing to full recognition.
Virtual Assets Act of 2023 - The Game Changer
June2023 saw the National Assembly pass the Virtual Assets Act of 2023 (ActNo.10of2023). The law does three things:
- Requires every Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) to register with the Namibia Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority (NAMFISA).
- Imposes AML and counter‑terrorist financing (CTF) obligations, including the Travel Rule for transactions over NAD20,000.
- Bans foreign crypto‑exchange platforms from operating in Namibia.
At the same time, the Payment System Management Act of 2023 was enacted to align traditional payment services with the new virtual‑asset framework.
Provisional Licensing in 2025
In January2025 BON rolled out a two‑step provisional licensing model. Three firms earned a six‑month provisional authorisation:
- Landifa Bitcoin TradeCC
- United PayPoint (Pty) Ltd
- Mindex Virtual Asset Exchange
During the provisional period the companies cannot engage Namibian customers or conduct any business on‑shore. The sandbox is meant for building compliance infrastructure, hiring staff, and proving AML/CTF readiness.
Two firms asked for deadline extensions:
- Landifa Bitcoin TradeCC - extended to 31July2025
- United PayPoint - extended to 13May2025
- Mindex Virtual Asset Exchange - extended to 21November2025
Bon spokesperson Kazembire Zemburuka explained that extensions are granted only after a thorough due‑diligence review.
Compliance Checklist for VASPs
To move from provisional to full licence, a VASP must satisfy the following:
- Fully documented AML/CTF policies that meet NAMFISA standards.
- Real‑time transaction monitoring and risk‑scoring engines.
- Travel Rule compliance: capture sender/receiver name, ID number, address, and account details for any transfer > NAD20,000.
- Secure data storage for at least five years, with encrypted backups.
- Proof of financial capacity - minimum capital of NAD5million (≈USD300k).
- Qualified compliance officer with a recognised certification.
Failure to meet any condition can lead to a revoked provisional licence and possible fines.

Impact on Individual Users
While firms juggle licensing, everyday crypto enthusiasts face a different reality. Legal practitioners have reported that banks such as NedBank and Standard Bank have placed restrictions on account holders involved in crypto clubs. The restrictions range from temporary freezes to full closures, even though the users have not broken any specific banking rule - the banks simply act on BON’s broader guidance.
Critics argue BON lacks legislative authority to penalise private citizens directly and should seek court orders instead of unilateral banking actions. The uncertainty has forced many users to move funds to offshore wallets or peer‑to‑peer platforms that fall outside the formal banking system.
Paradox: Licences vs Illegal Trading
Even after the Virtual Assets Act, BON still states that crypto trading is not legal tender and remains “technically illegal.” Yet the same authority grants licences to VASPs. This creates a contradictory environment where a business can be registered to offer services that the law technically bans for the general public.
The paradox fuels both optimism and caution. On one side, regulated firms can eventually bring transparent services to market. On the other, investors remain wary because the legal status of their personal trades is unresolved.
Comparison of Provisional License Holders (2025)
Company | Original End Date | Extension Requested | Current Status (Oct2025) |
---|---|---|---|
Landifa Bitcoin TradeCC | 31Jan2025 | 31Jul2025 | Awaiting final audit |
United PayPoint (Pty) Ltd | 31Jan2025 | 13May2025 | Under review, compliance gaps noted |
Mindex Virtual Asset Exchange | 31Jan2025 | 21Nov2025 | Operating sandbox, monitoring tools installed |
What Businesses Should Do Now
If you plan to launch a crypto service in Namibia, follow this quick checklist:
- Apply for a provisional licence with NAMFISA; include detailed AML/CTF policies.
- Set up a compliance team that can produce the Travel Rule data on demand.
- Invest in a secure, auditable transaction monitoring platform.
- Prepare for on‑site inspections - BON may send auditors at any time during the six‑month window.
- Maintain open communication with local banks to avoid account freezes for your staff.
Meeting these steps boosts the chance of a full licence before the provisional period ends.
What Users Can Do to Protect Themselves
For individuals, the safest path is to keep crypto activity separate from primary banking accounts. Use reputable international wallets that comply with KYC, and retain full transaction records in case a bank asks for proof of source of funds. If you belong to an investment club, consider forming a legal entity (e.g., a private company) to hold assets - this can make it easier to demonstrate compliance if questioned.
Stay updated on BON’s public statements; a sudden policy shift can happen, as seen when the Travel Rule threshold was set at NAD20,000 in late2023.
Looking Ahead - Will Namibia Become a Regional Crypto Hub?
The success of the provisional licences will likely decide Namibia’s fate. If the sandbox proves that strict AML/CTF can coexist with vibrant crypto services, regional players may view Namibia as a low‑risk entry point. Conversely, prolonged delays or harsher enforcement could push innovators to neighbouring countries with clearer rules.
For now, the market remains in limbo: licences exist, but public trading stays illegal, and banks keep watching crypto users closely. Keeping your expectations realistic and your compliance paperwork airtight is the best way to navigate this uncertain terrain.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bitcoin legal tender in Namibia?
No. The Bank of Namibia repeatedly states that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are not recognised as legal tender, meaning they cannot be used as official payment for goods, services, or taxes.
Can I open a bank account if I trade crypto?
Banks may place restrictions or freeze accounts of customers involved in crypto activities, even if the activity is legal under the Virtual Assets Act. Keeping crypto separate from your main banking relationship reduces the risk.
What is the Travel Rule and how does it apply in Namibia?
The Travel Rule requires VASPs to collect and share sender and receiver details for any transaction exceeding NAD20,000 (≈USD1,000). The data must be transmitted to the counter‑party VASP and stored for at least five years.
What happens after the six‑month provisional licence ends?
BON conducts a final audit. If the VASP meets all compliance, infrastructure, and capital requirements, a full operational licence is issued. Failure results in licence denial and possible fines.
Are foreign crypto exchanges allowed to operate in Namibia?
No. The Virtual Assets Act bans any crypto‑exchange that is not registered in Namibia. Only locally licensed VASPs may offer exchange services.
Comments
Jan B.
Great overview, the details about the sandbox really help clarify the current landscape.
August 10, 2025 AT 14:26
MARLIN RIVERA
The piece glosses over the real crux-namely that the provisional licences are nothing but a PR stunt to placate foreign investors while domestic users remain in the dark.
August 12, 2025 AT 14:26
Debby Haime
Hey folks, if you're navigating Namibia's crypto maze, keep your compliance docs tight and stay upbeat-these hurdles are just stepping stones to a healthier ecosystem!
August 14, 2025 AT 14:26
emmanuel omari
As an African observer, I can say that Namibia's tentative steps reflect a broader continental push to harness digital finance while safeguarding sovereign economic interests.
August 16, 2025 AT 14:26
Andy Cox
Sounds like a cautious approach.
August 18, 2025 AT 14:26
Courtney Winq-Microblading
The Namibian regulatory experiment is a fascinating case study in balancing innovation with risk.
On one hand, the Virtual Assets Act signals a willingness to engage with the digital economy.
On the other, the prohibition of crypto as legal tender creates a paradox that can stifle genuine adoption.
The sandbox model allows VASPs to build compliance infrastructure under close supervision.
This incremental approach can reduce the chance of sudden regulatory crackdowns that have plagued other jurisdictions.
However, the six‑month provisional window is arguably too short for firms to fully operationalize AML and CTF controls.
The extensions granted to Landifa, United PayPoint, and Mindex illustrate both flexibility and the underlying uncertainty of the process.
For users, the risk of bank account freezes remains a palpable deterrent, especially when institutions act pre‑emptively.
Practically, segregating crypto assets from primary banking relationships is a prudent safeguard.
Moreover, the Travel Rule threshold of NAD20,000 is modest, but its enforcement will demand robust data handling capabilities.
Companies that can demonstrate transparent transaction monitoring will likely secure full licences faster.
Conversely, those that lag may face fines or revocation, undermining investor confidence.
In the broader regional context, Namibia could become a gateway for crypto services into Southern Africa if it gets the balance right.
Yet any perception of regulatory capriciousness could push innovators toward more crypto‑friendly neighbors.
Ultimately, the success of this sandbox will be measured by how effectively it bridges the gap between legal ambiguity and practical usability.
August 20, 2025 AT 14:26
katie littlewood
What an insightful deep‑dive; the layered analysis really underscores how critical a balanced regulatory path is for fostering trust and growth.
August 22, 2025 AT 14:26
Jenae Lawler
While the article attempts to be comprehensive, it fails to appreciate the deeper philosophical implications of labeling crypto as non‑tender.
August 24, 2025 AT 14:26
Chad Fraser
Keep pushing forward, the hurdles are temporary and the future rewards are worth the effort.
August 26, 2025 AT 14:26
Jayne McCann
Seems like they’re just moving the goalposts.
August 28, 2025 AT 14:26
Richard Herman
I think the key is dialogue between regulators and the community to find a middle ground.
August 30, 2025 AT 14:26
Parker Dixon
Open communication is essential 🤝-if you need help interpreting the Travel Rule, just shout out! 😃
September 1, 2025 AT 14:26
Stefano Benny
The AML compliance matrix is a labyrinthine construct that obscures rather than clarifies operational viability.
September 3, 2025 AT 14:26
Bobby Ferew
Honestly, reading this makes me feel more confused than enlightened.
September 5, 2025 AT 14:26
celester Johnson
One could argue that the regulatory haze is a mirror reflecting society’s uneasy relationship with decentralized power.
September 7, 2025 AT 14:26
Prince Chaudhary
Stay informed and respect the current limits while preparing for future opportunities.
September 9, 2025 AT 14:26
John Kinh
Another fluff piece, same old talk.
September 11, 2025 AT 14:26
Mark Camden
From an ethical standpoint, the authorities are obliged to protect citizens from speculative risk, and the provisional licensing framework aligns with that fiduciary duty.
September 13, 2025 AT 14:26
Evie View
The whole sandbox charade is just a corporate façade to lull investors into a false sense of security.
September 15, 2025 AT 14:26
Kate Roberge
Yo, this is just buzzword bingo.
September 17, 2025 AT 14:26
Oreoluwa Towoju
Ask specific questions, get precise answers.
September 19, 2025 AT 14:26
Carl Robertson
The narrative is drenched in hype, ignoring the stark reality of limited market access.
September 21, 2025 AT 14:26
Rajini N
If you need a step‑by‑step guide on preparing AML documentation, feel free to request a template; I’ll gladly share one.
September 23, 2025 AT 14:26
Sidharth Praveen
Stay positive, the path will clear with persistence.
September 25, 2025 AT 14:26